Math is not performance art. It's a private
improvisation, a moment's commitment to
memory of right privation of mind,
sensory deprivation of all but phenylethyl-
amine dream of love in solution:
["Love in solution" (only mixture):
the flavor is 'arrow of time', how
anything happens is a vector, directed forward and away, for
every action an equal contribution to degenerate case. Spi-
nors asymmetric in the stomach of first love and algebra. Drink. It is
axiomatic, at the end of a class, that hands converge: no
need to think; but the fact -- we feel -- that
everything real is also complex is … ]
the [ = THEO-]
dream of (numb-) saturation (-er), neurons'
yawning gasp of synapse as the skies start
factoring in long silences at last, long
walks down garden paths observing
talks with something to prove.
[ … "something to prove".
Bent low over desks, discretely sounding out
steps, we quietly -- rose of eraser -- sum(b)vocal cantation to
fitfully rigorous prayer. As almost one, we stare -- loose
vector of eyes -- at the eastern board, the improbable rise, each
morning, there of perfect circles suggestive of n. Look
close enough in and the folds smooth out, Loba-
chevskian spirit un-
clothed in the son to
visit Euclidean
space: it's about time.]
Re- [ = -RY (neither -REM nor -LOGY)]
cover rather than dis-, and -member,
-call the lovers' morning notes of de-
pressing distinction; the integration (self, other) has a
least upper bound: "it was the lark", whose
song resounds in periodic confessions
["Some periodic confessions":
I know enough math to make it seem like I do; once
threw a charcoal Calculus across the room; gave
up -- at that point -- any trying to prove; gave my -- much later and
also vanishing -- self to you: rational and, so, un-
real. All this to whom? If an animal names and permutes the
four-letter words like DNA snippets, bio-
logical computational proof --, re- … ]
of [ = OF (of course)]
us in always natural light, the
ideal pieces of meteor strikes "that the
sun exhales" in heliacal rise, all
sides and angles aligned, and warmed:
sensible bodies, not extraordinary forms, and
[ … -verse engineers our "ordinary forms",
prismatic and streaked, when
next we meet, would we be simple since unimaginary (not
-tive), and skip the manifold possibilities, stick to basic a-
rithmetic, reading and (A:w)ri(B:gh)ting each other with no long divisions, sub-
tractions subtracted -- we'll forget satisfying the field axioms -- multipli-
cation permitted so long as it's of metaphor, or of touch? And
count on days' tabulation to prove how
much. Such, at least, is the theory of]
love [ = LOVE (or, in the
absence of proof,
improvisation: you start by saying
"Yes", then "Let you and me." The
rest is math. QED
(-esiderandum)].
(Edited 3 September 2009, transcribed 30 August 2009, begun 29 August 2009. I struggled with this, and so hope to have given this poem the capacity to speak well for itself; but for bibliophiles -- you know who you are -- the -graphy includes, in order of I'm remembering them, Augustine, John Donne, Roger Penrose, and John Milton (for inspiring the centermost notion, that the most interesting thing about a miracle -- its beauty, really -- is its strictly incidental and so unmeaningful _precision_ of occasion in human time).)